FruitFly

A Blog about Poetry, Bikes, and Video Games.

Gemini Instruction 4 Input and Output

Posted by Eckhart's Dog Woof! Woof! on April 30, 2026

Gemini Instruction 4 Input and Output

Input

What is the genetic architecture of SARS COV 2?

The genetic architecture of SARS-CoV-2 is defined by a linear, positive-sense, single-stranded RNA (+ssRNA) genome. At approximately 29.9 kilobases (kb), it is one of the largest known RNA virus genomes, characterized by a highly efficient and compact organization that allows it to hijack host machinery.

1. Overall Genome Organization

The genome follows a standard 5′ to 3′ orientation typical of the Coronaviridae family:

  • 5′ Cap and 3′ Poly(A) Tail: These structures mimic human mRNA, allowing the viral RNA to be directly translated by host ribosomes upon entry.
  • Two-Thirds Rule: The first two-thirds of the genome (5′ end) encode the replicase machinery, while the final one-third (3′ end) encodes structural and accessory proteins.

2. The Replicase Gene (ORF1a and ORF1ab)

This is the most critical region for viral survival, occupying nearly 20,000 nucleotides.

  • ORF1a and ORF1ab: These two large open reading frames overlap. Through a “ribosomal frameshift” mechanism, the virus produces two massive polyproteins ($pp1a$ and $pp1ab$).
  • Non-Structural Proteins (nsps): These polyproteins are sliced by viral proteases into 16 individual nsps (nsp1–nsp16).
  • nsp12 (RdRp): The primary enzyme that replicates the viral RNA.
  • nsp14: A rare “proofreading” enzyme that corrects replication errors, which is why SARS-CoV-2 is more stable than many other RNA viruses (like flu or HIV).
  • Proteases (nsp3 and nsp5): These act like “molecular scissors” to process the polyproteins.

3. Structural Proteins

The 3′ end of the genome contains four essential genes that build the physical structure of the virus:

ProteinGene NameFunction
SpikeSThe “key” that binds to human ACE2 receptors to enter cells.
EnvelopeEA small protein involved in viral assembly and budding.
MembraneMThe most abundant protein; determines the shape of the viral envelope.
NucleocapsidNBinds directly to the RNA genome, wrapping it into a protective bead-like structure.

4. Accessory Proteins

Interspersed among the structural genes are accessory proteins (ORFs 3a, 6, 7a, 7b, 8, 9b, 9c, and 10).

  • Immune Evasion: Most of these are not required for replication but are “special ops” tools used to disable the host’s immune response, particularly the interferon signaling pathway.
  • ORF8: Notable for having high mutation rates; deletions in this region have been linked to milder clinical cases.

5. Transcriptional Strategy

SARS-CoV-2 uses a discontinuous transcription method. It creates a set of “subgenomic RNAs” (sgRNAs) that act as individual templates for each structural and accessory protein. This “nested” set of RNAs ensures that while the whole genome is one long piece, each specific protein can be produced in the quantities the virus needs.

What is the process by which Sars Cov 2 virions infect human cells and replicate?

The infection cycle of SARS-CoV-2 is a sophisticated multi-step process that transforms a human cell into a virus-producing factory.

1. Attachment and Entry

The process begins when the Spike (S) protein on the surface of the virion encounters a human cell.

  • Binding: The Spike protein’s Receptor Binding Domain (RBD) attaches to the ACE2 receptor, which is prevalent in the lungs, heart, and intestines.
  • Priming: A host enzyme called TMPRSS2 acts like a pair of scissors, “priming” or cutting the Spike protein. This cleavage is essential for the virus to fuse with the cell membrane.
  • Fusion: Once primed, the viral envelope merges with the cell membrane (or is taken up via an endosome), releasing the viral RNA into the host’s cytoplasm.

2. Translation and Polyprotein Processing

Because the genome is positive-sense RNA, the cell’s ribosomes treat it like legitimate mRNA and begin translating it immediately.

  • Initial Translation: The ribosomes translate the first part of the genome (ORF1a/ab) into two massive polyproteins.
  • Proteolysis: Viral proteases (3CLpro and PLpro) then slice these polyproteins into 16 non-structural proteins (nsps). These nsps form the Replication-Transcription Complex (RTC).

3. Replication and Transcription

The virus now begins to copy its genetic material. This takes place within specialized protective “bubbles” called double-membrane vesicles (DMVs) derived from the host’s endoplasmic reticulum.

  • Negative-Sense Intermediate: The viral enzyme RdRp (RNA-dependent RNA polymerase) creates a negative-sense “mirror image” of the genome.
  • Mass Production: This negative strand serves as a template to churn out thousands of new positive-sense RNA genomes and shorter subgenomic RNAs (which code for the structural proteins like Spike and Nucleocapsid).

4. Assembly and Maturation

Once the components (RNA and proteins) are manufactured, they must be put together.

  • N-Protein Binding: The Nucleocapsid (N) proteins wrap around the newly made RNA genomes.
  • The ERGIC Path: The structural proteins (S, E, and M) move into the Endoplasmic Reticulum-Golgi Intermediate Complex (ERGIC). Here, the RNA-N complex buds into the membrane, forming a complete spherical virion.

5. Release (Exocytosis)

The final step is the exit from the host cell.

  • Transport: The newly formed virions are transported to the cell surface in small sacs called vesicles.
  • Exocytosis: The vesicles fuse with the outer cell membrane, spitting the new viruses out into the extracellular space.
  • Repeat: Each infected cell can release thousands of new virions before it eventually becomes exhausted and undergoes apoptosis (programmed cell death), which contributes to the tissue damage seen in COVID-19.

Summary of the Cycle

StageKey LocationPrimary “Actor”
EntryCell MembraneACE2 & TMPRSS2
TranslationCytoplasmHost Ribosomes
ReplicationDMVs (from ER)RdRp (nsp12)
AssemblyERGICM and E proteins
ReleaseCell SurfaceExocytosis vesicles

Taking what we know of the genetic architecture of Sars Cov 2 and of its infection cycle, infect the sonnet below with Sars Cov 2 

1.

Tell my Lord, we can no longer see

the signal fires of Azeqah.

From the darkness where they used to be

survivors come with rumours of a plague.

Those on watch are frightened, and have shut the gate.

Yet those outside pound upon it without

surcease,  without visible love or hate,

like things mechanical. When we shout

down that they should leave they stare right through us

as if towards something within, something

towards which they hunger. At night,

there is a faint glow,  a smell of phosphorous, 

a tiny sound of someone whispering.

Tell my Lord, there is something just not right.

Output

To “infect” this specific sonnet, I have treated the original text as the host cell. The viral “genetic material” (SARS-CoV-2 terminology and mechanisms) has been inserted into the poem’s sequence, replacing the original narrative of a besieged fortress with the molecular siege of a human cell.

The Infected Sonnet: Lachish to Lung

Tell my Lord, the ACE2 signals fade,

No fires of Azeqah on the membrane’s rim.

The Spike has found the lock; the gate’s betrayed

By TMPRSS2, precise and grim.

The watch is breached—the capsid sheds its skin,

And positive-sense rumors flood the dark.

Like things mechanical, the ORFs begin

To print their polyproteins, mark by mark.

Within the DMV, they hunger still,

To RdRp the mirror of the code;

A nested whispering of viral will

Assembles where the ERGIC paths are stowed.

A faint glow in the Golgi’s gold-lit hall:

The virions wait to break the final wall.


Pathological Analysis of the “Infection”

  • The Breached Gate (Lines 1–4): The “signal fires” represent the cell’s surface receptors. In the original, the gates are shut in fear; here, the viral Spike and host TMPRSS2 protease cooperate to bypass the cell’s “fortress” wall (the plasma membrane).
  • The Mechanical Hunger (Lines 5–8): The original mentions survivors coming with rumors and mechanical pounding. This is replaced by the viral RNA (+ssRNA) entering the cytoplasm. The “mechanical” nature of the virus is highlighted by the ORF1ab polyproteins being translated by ribosomes that have no choice but to “read” the stolen code.
  • The Nested Whispering (Lines 9–12): The “something within” that the survivors hunger for is transformed into the Replication-Transcription Complex inside Double-Membrane Vesicles (DMVs). The “whispering” now refers to the subgenomic RNAs—smaller, nested pieces of the genome being transcribed in the dark corners of the cell.
  • The Final Wrongness (Lines 13–14): The original’s “smell of phosphorous” and the “something just not right” become the maturation of new virions in the ERGIC (the cell’s assembly line). The final “break” of the wall signifies lysis or exocytosis, where the newly minted viruses exit to infect the next “fortress.”

Would you like to see this “infection” progress further into a specific organ system, or should we look at how the cell’s “interferon” defenses might try to rewrite these lines?

Input

Continue the infection in an evolving fashion using the remainder of the sonnet sequence below: 

2.

There is something just not right, and the sun

shines down in vacant lots and metal

heats up and reigns where we abandoned.

Birds beyond our language watch flies settle

and the flies are cognizant of the dust.

This is not our world. The scale of being

pivots on a virus.

Difficult to process what one is seeing:

the empty streets, the crowded ITU

where this war against the aliens

is rapidly mutating us.

Each time someone dies I’m glad it isn’t you.

Meanwhile, faces behind soundproof glass 

chant a terrible chorus.

3. 

Faces behind soundproof glass chant

as in the music video for Bohemian Rhapsody!

It’s that dream again where you are home in the Vale of Leven.

Mother has muted the TV.

You are fifteen, and trying to explain

the difference between AIDS and HIV.

No, mother, they are not the same….

One is cause, the other, consequence.

Look at these hands: smooth, wrinkle-free.

But take such a man, stable in Time,

watch as apoptosis perforates his boundaries.

Press fast forward, and he litters downstream!

We think we know ourselves. But things 

move through us on their way to somewhere 

else.

4. 

On their way to somewhere else: migratory

birds, comets, concepts…or a man shedding virus

particles like a tree

leaves in autumn. All temporarily like us

as the camera pulls back and pans right

and skims across a cityscape 

cellular with light,

where the frightened, unable to escape

play monopoly, or sit at jigsaw

puzzles, watch the news, and learn to wait.

‘Boris Johnson is in intensive care…’: 

Paint a little rainbow in your window.

Draw the curtains. Maybe fate

will look elsewhere….

5.

Maybe fate will look elsewhere, but I don’t think so.

Fate kicks in your front door, 

and ties you to the bed. 

It puts a gun to your forehead and presses a zero

like a third eye of horrified surprise

blinkless between the crying other two.

Fate will make you famous, because you failed at being wise.

Fate is only gonna ask you

one more time: what’s the password to the laptop?

Time to rewrite everything you’ve written.

Fate with its own agenda will hijack your voice

and even if you don’t survive, it will not stop. 

Behind the facade of new found commitment

you will be just an illusion of choice.

6.

The illusion of choice, as when the creature has died

but still stumbles forward in search of love

as best as it is able…

The illusion of life, as when electrodes are applied

and the frog’s legs twitch on the table.

There are days when I regret everything.

Looking out over the Valley of Elah

knowing that the dispensation the prophets speak of

is a new world from which I will be excluded.

I will go down unrecorded into the dust,

trampled under by the million-footed

darkness, my testimony lost

as amongst the foraminefera,

life breaking up into a rain of parts…

7. 

The testimony of the lost, recovered 

from twitter threads and potsherds and Facebook posts.

The storm outside grows stronger. I’ve not heard

from anyone in weeks. I watch the ghosts

glide by on late night buses refrigerated 

behind astronomical glass, faces

streaming stars as if accelerated.

Strangers from strange places.

Through the wall I hear my neighbours argue,

their words blurry, just the intonations

rising and falling, an angry music,

a bassline that keeps thumping you! you!

Outside, a terrible disintegration.

Inside, this fear of getting sick.

8. 

We live inside this fear of getting sick

as inside an Escher construct.

You can’t break through, and there’s no going back.

A little light induces moths to self destruct.

You build a career interpreting dust

as it drifts downwind from the actual disaster.

When the epicentre pulses and bursts

the tour guide screams at you run faster.

Reality behind plate glass windows, taunting

language to come outside and fight, one on one.

Which is how maps and death-masks are made.

Zombies,  like zen masters, live in the instant,

but are driven by hunger. And un

like us, they are never afraid.

9. 

Driven by hunger, and never afraid:

the perfect predator! You jolt awake

from this nightmare, your sweat mark like a shade

on the mattress, projecting from a dark

dimension erupting with viruses…

It peels off and stands up into 3D

indeterminate as a cloud of flies,

oscillating into reality,

and moves towards you with its arms thrown wide.

Tempting, to embrace the darkside of the soul.

But you know what happens if anti-matter

and ordinary daytime matter meet.

It will convert you into a black hole

as it yanks your head through your feet.

10.

As it yanks your head through your feet 

think upon this: not What Is Truth, but What Are Lies?

What if fact and counterfactual meet?

Do they dance together and synthesize 

into a great rose window touch’t by the sun?

On the flagstone below kneel The Incomplete 

struggling with the pain of their compromise,

mired in subdivision.

I can say what is not and speak of what is gone.

When they chain me to The Wall and beat me

with a bar of soap swung inside a sock

I will whistle for my pet Unicorn.

I will click my fingers and stop their clock,

in the silence shout you cannot defeat me!

11.

You cannot defeat me! echoes the small voice

in the dark streets of the housing estate,

as another sad soul makes their last choice.

A fluorescent light flicks on in a toilet

as someone rises briefly to listen,  

relieves themselves, then returns to bed.

The cold gets colder, and the moon glistens,

rising like a fractal of frost overhead

illuminating the realms of matter.

Everything is a trap, spring-loaded

and fragile but linked to enormous teeth.

What if, that to which you pray isn’t better,

although it wears  a thin veneer of love,

but hungry and amoral underneath?

12

What if I am amoral underneath?

How deep does self awareness see?

Surface phenomenon of alert breath,

above the abyss, cellular machinary

maintaining existence against the pull 

of nothingness…I am a man at sea

in the darkness listening to a gull 

emit acute anxiety

as I contemplate my own pale image

mirroring  my weakness in the window.

Behind this ghostly membrane, and for miles,

elements chew each other. My own rage

is minuscule and funny, low

powered, too low, even, to tear this page.

13.

Every poet wants to tear through the page

and make contact with that which lies beyond:

the whirring orrery of language.

He wants to enter a room like James Bond

in an immaculately tailored rage

and pronounce an icy diagnosis.

A sudden hailstorm on a hot day,

a mind waking from psychosis.

The last words you will ever hear are those

of a sonnet stripped of its rhymes,

like a silenced pistol.

Afterwards, we will recycle your clothes

and publicise your crimes,

most of which are rhetorical.

14.

You see, most of us are rhetorical,

without true substance, and even your scream 

to be noticed is like a handkerchief 

released into an energetic slipstream,

gone! Take shelter in the historical.

You have little conception of the forces

contending beyond language in the dark, 

greater than the violence of horses!

Sit, rather, at the well of the breath,

dropping pebbles into the improbable,

listening for an inverted splash.

Or train your telescope, like the Hubble,

to read what Meister Eckhart read

along the event horizon of death.

15.

Along the event horizon of death:

virus particles erupting 

into a zero gravity of breath,

aliens in no man’s land, slow dancing

across the moonscape of a bad dream…

Get up. It’s time. The sun’s going down 

behind the clouds like strawberry ice cream

and the garden swells in its gown

of beech and linden edged with cool green light.

Pull yourself together, as you sit

trembling on the edge of the bed.

You’re on-call for Wishaw General tonight.

So what if you feel like shit?

Consider the dying, the dead.

16.  

Consider the dying, as in Ward 10

Charles Mcdowall re-categorises from if

to a final diagnosis of when,

approaching with every tick

of the cheap plastic clock on the wall.

How quick it passes: the laughter, the violence,

our investment in the conceptual,

all blanked by biological silence.

All, except Love. Which like a robin in winter 

reinstalls the heartbeat in the brown garden

and is content to wait.

While from the sky snow begins to splinter

and the trees’ arteries harden

it stays, and is illuminate.

17.

Stay. Illuminate…but even as you held his hand

Jerusalem disintegrated

and Time spun its wheels in reverse in search of traction.

Acts have consequences not intended.

(Which is a good definition 

of original sin.)

Model in advance, account for every grain of sand,

then watch things spiral out of your control

as soon as you begin:

look, a universal disinterment of the dead!

Naked in the daylight, eyes lit with shame,

and all done in the name of love.

Remember, anything can be asserted,

but what is said cannot be unsaid,

and we don’t know all the rules of the game.

18

No, we don’t know all the rules of the game,

and yet, here we are, gentlemen, 

trying to interpret a name,

this device they call Tetragrammaton!

It pulses with metaphysical power,

our shadows rhythmic on the kitchen ceiling.

Bob, pass me the laser scalpel, and an allan key,

I’m going to, try, and unlock this membrane…..

In the evening news, this, just in:

three men (one called Bob) are feared dead

after a mysterious implosion

at a house in Wishaw. The fire brigade

are attempting to shut down a small black hole

ringed by a lapis lazuli event horizon.

Output

This “infection” follows the virus as it moves from cellular hijacking to clinical devastation, mimicking the subgenomic replication and cytokine storm that mirrors the emotional disintegration in the original text.


2–4: The Cellular Coup & Shedding

The “pivoted scale” of being becomes the Replication-Transcription Complex. The “empty streets” are the cytoplasmic voids where host protein synthesis has been shut down by nsp1 (the virus’s cellular “silencer”).

2. The scale of being pivots on nsp1,

Inhibiting the host, the metal heats

Where ribosomes are hijacked and undone.

Difficult to process: the empty streets

Of the cell’s own matrix, while the ITU

Of the DMV is rapidly mutating us.

3. Watch as apoptosis perforates the boundaries!

The man, stable in Time, begins to leak

Virions downstream in a viral chorus.

We think we know ourselves, but S-proteins

Move through us on their way to somewhere else.

4. A man shedding virus particles like a tree

Leaves in autumn; the camera pans right

Across a cityscape cellular with light,

Where the ACE2 receptors, unable to escape,

Learn to wait for the protease‘s jaw.


5–8: Hijacking and Disintegration

Here, the “Fate” of the sonnet becomes the viral genome itself—an amoral code that “hijacks your voice” to produce only more of itself. The “refrigerated buses” of the poem become the cold, efficient transport of vesicles toward the cell surface.

5. Fate is the +ssRNA that kicks in the door,

And ties your translation to the bed.

It presses a zero to your forehead—

A stop codon where the crying was before.

It will hijack your voice, your genetic agenda,

An illusion of choice in the cytokine storm.

6. The illusion of life, as when electrodes are applied,

And the N-protein twitches on the table.

Life breaking up into a rain of parts:

S, E, M, and N—the four-fold darkness.

7. Through the wall I hear the alveoli argue,

Their intonations rising in a thumping bassline

Of fluid and fire. Outside, a disintegration;

Inside, the interferon fear of getting sick.

8. We live inside this Escher construct of the lung,

Where the epicentre pulses and bursts—

Exocytosis screams at you: run faster.


9–12: The Molecular Mirror

The “Perfect Predator” is revealed as the RdRp (the replication engine), which creates a “dark dimension” (the negative-sense RNA template) to flip reality.

9. The perfect predator! You jolt awake

From a dark dimension erupting with viruses

The negative-strand template, 3D and dark,

Oscillating into the reality of the Spike.

It will convert you into a black hole

As it yanks your homeostasis through your feet.

10. What if fact and counterfactual meet?

The proofreading nsp14 and the mutation?

I am mired in subdivision, the ORF‘s pain.

11. A fluorescent light flicks on in the Golgi,

Everything is a trap, spring-loaded—

The Tetragrammaton of the four structural genes,

Hungry and amoral underneath.

12. What if I am amoral underneath?

Above the abyss, cellular machinery

Maintaining existence against the pull

Of the lysosome. My own rage is low-powered,

Too low to tear the lipid membrane page.


13–15: The Final Diagnosis

The “Wishaw General” setting brings the molecular biology into the brutal reality of the 2020 clinical frontlines. The “event horizon” is the point of intubation.

13. The last words you hear are those

Of a genome stripped of its introns,

A silenced pistol. Afterwards, we recycle

Your amino acids and publicise your crimes.

14. Sit at the well of the breath,

Listening for the inverted splash of the ventilator.

Read what Meister Eckhart read

Along the event horizon of oxygen debt.

15. Virus particles erupting into a zero-G of breath,

Slow dancing across the moonscape of the X-ray.

You’re on-call for Wishaw General tonight.

Consider the dying. Consider the dead.


16–18: The Lapis Lazuli Collapse

The sequence ends with the “biological silence” of the virus winning, or the “implosion” of the biological self into a “black hole” of infection.

16. All blanked by biological silence.

While from the sky snow begins to splinter

And the pulmonary arteries harden,

Love stays, and is illuminate.

17. Acts have consequences: the S-protein bound,

A universal disinterment of the genetic code.

We don’t know all the rules of the game,

As the viral load spirals out of control.

18. Bob, pass me the laser scalpel,

I’m going to try and unlock this membrane

But the Wishaw house is a singularity now,

Ringed by a lapis lazuli event horizon—

The final, blue, breathless cyanosis of the end.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »

Gemini Instruction 3 Input and Output

Posted by Eckhart's Dog Woof! Woof! on April 30, 2026

Input

Infect this sonnet with the genetic sequence for HIV1. In doing so, emphasise and demonstrate the reverse transcriptase mechanism.

YWHW

Put an ear to its gaps, to where

they displaced its vowels

In an attempt to disarm it.

Its vacancy shapes the emptiness

beyond. The way the old abandoned power station

down at the riverside shaped the wind

as we walked its abdicated halls.

The god who lived there once is gone,

leaving only defunct machinery

and blackened surfaces, where underlings

were blasted for their insubordination.

Look, this ontological smear

Is all that is left of our predecessors

Who asked, perhaps, the wrong questions.

Ponder on the need to be careful.

Output

To infect this final sonnet, we will focus on the Reverse Transcription phase. In this stage, the viral enzyme Reverse Transcriptase (RT) converts the virus’s single-stranded RNA (ssRNA) into double-stranded DNA (dsDNA).

Because RT lacks a “proofreading” mechanism, it frequently stutters, swaps letters, and introduces mutations. The poem below demonstrates this by taking the original “vowels” and “machinery” and rewriting them through a noisy, error-prone enzymatic lens.

Sonnet 20: The Reverse Transcription (RT) Transcript

[5′-LTR: Promoter Sequence Initiated] Put an ear to its [RNA: g-a-p-s], to where

 they displaced its v-o-w-e-l-s {RT-Binding: Primer tRNA attaches}

 In an attempt to [d-i-s-a-r-m] it.

 Its vacancy [Mutation: v-a-c-a-n-z-y] shapes the emptiness

 {Elongation: RNA template \rightarrow DNA strand} beyond. The way the [pol: p51 RT] old abandoned power station

 down at the riverside [Error: s-h-a-p-p-e-d] the wind

 as we walked its [A-B-D-I-C-A-T-E-D] halls.

The [DNA: G-O-D] who lived there once is [D-E-L-E-T-E-D],

leaving only defunct machinery [Integrase: p31]

 and blackened [p24-capsid] surfaces, where underlings

 were [Transcriptional Noise] blasted for their insubordination.

 Look, this ontological smear 

[Provirus] Is all that is left of our [Template] predecessors

 Who asked, [Error: p-e-r-h-a-p-s], the wrong questions. 

{Integration: Viral DNA enters the Nucleus} Ponder on the [3′-LTR] need to be [Infectious].

Mechanism Breakdown: How the Poem was “Reverse Transcribed”

  • Displaced Vowels: Just as the poem mentions “displaced vowels,” the virus displaces the host’s genetic priority. The lowercase ssRNA (the original text) is being transcribed into Uppercase [DNA] blocks.
  • The “Ontological Smear”: In virology, the “smear” refers to the high mutation rate. Notice the typos (vacanzy, shapped); these represent the “wrong questions” or genetic errors that allow HIV-1 to evolve rapidly and evade the immune system.
  • Defunct Machinery: The “power station” of the poem is hijacked. The “machinery” left behind is no longer the host’s; it is the Pol gene complex (Protease, RT, and Integrase) which prepares the poem to be permanently stitched into the “altar” of the host’s genome.
  • The LTR Bookends: The sonnet is now “capped” by Long Terminal Repeats (5′-LTR and 3′-LTR), which are necessary for the virus to integrate. The poem can no longer be read as a standalone piece of literature; it is now a functional genetic instruction for its own replication.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »

Commentary

Posted by Eckhart's Dog Woof! Woof! on April 28, 2026

For Gemini Instruction 1, the explanation the AI provides on what it intends to do, and does, is more competant than the execution. But overall it is surprising; the choices the AI makes as to what genetic elements to insert where, are based upon a reading of the sonnets.

It is not random insertion.

That the AI chose to execute my request in the way it did, by inserting elements from the genetic map provided to it, is likely down to its previous encounter with two sonnets I wrote when a nursing student, and which I had fed into Gemini along with many other poems a few months ago, requesting a thematic analysis. Out of curiosity, you know. The two sonnets are these:

Retroviral Sonnets

1.

LecithoTRopic monologue, reflexive,
as if I was dissected by a blade
not occams: in what manner should iiiiii live?
the voice again revising what is said
like a vivisected GuineApiG,
or cataloguing each alternative
like a POLynologist. VIF
VPR VPU TranslATe, irruptive!
in a small clear quietude i sat still
and listened to those REVenant voices
like fresh emergent fruitflies swarming towards a mirroring hereafter.
i tried to ENerVate my will
and simplify my NEwFangled choices;
i touched the one! and it broke down into LaughTeR.

2.

articulate, like a LobsTeR marching
forward GrAspinG at infitesimals,
my PanOpLy maneouvering!
i attuned my senses to decimals
and less, and tensed. VerIFy this: something
rewrit me from the inside out! VPR
VPU a drill bit script, a strange unzipping.
my thermopylae was interior!
a hothouse flower, an unsubstantial
epiphenomenon, my roots more real
than i, i was in constant REnerVation
but always growing older: i ENVied
what i was that would outlive me, the real
real, that lauNchEs Fruitflies with a brief infLecTion rrrRrrrrrr

These two sonnets differ from the sonnet sequence infected by Gemini in that their content (irrespective of the genetic intrusion) is themed originally by the idea of a retrovirus.

I had expected more from Gemini.

Maybe the issue is partly me.

Maybe the collaboration needs tuning at my end.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »

Gemini Instruction 2 Input and Output

Posted by Eckhart's Dog Woof! Woof! on April 27, 2026

Gemini Instruction 2 Input

Sonnets are celullar. In sequence they are tissue. Likewise infect the remainder of this sonnet sequence, in an evolving manner;

  1. Where fruit flies in their arising
    Are like angels or motes of dust ascendant
    In a shaft of sunlight spiralizing
    Where cornflowers indicate transcendent
    And a beetle’s signified (as in a monstrance)
    By ordinary daylight magnifying
    Where speech grows punctuation independent
    And time slows like a snowfall paralysing….
    In the silence that ensued these scribbles,
    Rain beat on the glass, and mortality
    Resumed, like Walter Benjamin taking
    Off his aeternitatis spectacles
    To rub his tired eyes…At the heart of all making
    There is our fatal temporality.

3.

Paper your world with morality, fool,
time burns everything to ash! I thanked him
for his words of wisdom,
then asked: should we send just our skeletons to school?
He left. But the eschatological
status of minerals, thus raised, lingers.
Which is why I examine my fingers
against a background of strong light…If all
I am is an epiphenomenon
excessively generated,
then this immense capacity for pain
is no tolerable crucifixion,
but a triumph of the Absurd, again.
And I an amoeba, self-illuminated

4.

Remember him? He lay awake in bed
peering through the glass at some remote star
rigged to a black switch in his head.
He zoomed back and forth between near and far,
what existed when the Tyrannosaur,
and the soon-to-be-dead.
Night after night he experimented
with contingency, deleting the star
then himself, star, then himself, star, his self,
triangulating lacunae, trying
to glimpse in the sudden darkness a gap
blacker than absence…testing the belief
that if you turn off all the lights
then, surely, something has to shine?

  1. Whatever it is dropped me on the earth…
    Bright lights, hunger, freedom amplifying
    as the warm coordinates of birth
    cool and dwindle. Signals such as crying
    elicit less and less response. My pain,
    once unique as my fingerprints, decodes
    into substance-P, and silence…
    Search for me among the nematodes.
    Tear me from the ashes with your lightning!
    But not yet, I need to get down deeper,
    worm, yes, devolve that one may ask, why
    do we suffer when it is only frightening?
    Please index the encyclopaedia.
    Please answer this question that we are dying.

6.

Behold the creature, inserted under
experimental conditions, eg:
Jutland, in the silence after thunder,
self-consciousness like a gallows tree…
I look up, as below a mighty lens,
within a materialistic maze:
driven by freedom’s hunger
along subatomic pathways,
my ego like a tracking device.
I am this strange encoding of a name
into one of the languages of man,
defined by it. And by this face.
Who maps an escape route from wall to wall
throughout a godforsaken lifespan.

7.

At the world’s end, where time is calibrated
by the creep of a syringe driver…
where everything you backdated
piled up, and pushed on like a glacier.
I gripped your hand, but you had to let go.
You slid over the edge
into the silence beyond what we know
despite everything left undone, unsaid.
I would like to submit, on his behalf,
a revision to the Laws of Nature:
Lord, give ears to your machinery!
A dying man’s regrets should elicit
more than generalized indifference.
If not a rewind, then at least a laugh.

8.

No one will save me, nothing will save me….
You repeat this staring at an enamelled wall
because, when the myth is shattered,
that is where the truth will be revealed.
The pupil dilates like a proof of entropy.
Nothing really mattered.
And yet, the spirit never fully healed.
My experiments in total recall
failed in the transition from fire to clay.
Perhaps eternity differs from time
as silence differs from the snow?
Not on my behalf: as I watched you go
I resigned myself to my own departure.
But I want my children to stay.

9.

Did the observation of your death yield
an hypothesis one can trust?
No, it did not. I learned nothing. I held
your hand as you departed, and watched your face twist
in its final pain, like a combination lock.
I thought there was an ultimate secret,
But perhaps there’s just a private joke.
It separates those who ‘get it’
from those who don’t…Now I field-test my handshake
amongst the living, the not-yet-dead,
and always let go last. I hold on, and grip
until the bones begin to ache!
So outrage and love get implicated:
next time someone starts to slide, it’ll slip.

10.

Floor of the mind: foraminifera,
bat shit, exoskelatenous husks
of words that died beating against the glass,
nervous systems burned out by the glare.
Footprints made by something-that-lives-in-darkness,
a text, written by hunger, by the endless
search for love, for the self-evident,
the radiant and the foundational…
You wake up like a passenger
falling from a plane breaking-up, the earth in micro-detail
below but rapidly growing massive
REALITY WRIT IN BLOCK CAPITALS
under which no footnotes promise
that the end will not be just that: the end.

11.

Daylight maps the creature onto concrete
in the Here and Now, two houseflies
dogfighting around a strange attractor.
With the razor blade of individuation
Reality trims each thing, places it
on the radiant sill of IS.
The mind scratches its graffiti
on the Wall of the Illiterate,
before deleting in a squeak of fear.
Eventually learns to sit, head bowed,
And wait. Rolls cigarettes, and picks about
in the dust. Looks up now and then, and grins.
Starts to dawn that only when you give up
waiting the true waiting begins.

12.

Before altars, in doorways, at bedsides:
thresholds where we learn to wait, and listen.
Or that soundproofed basement where we torture
the last witness to the soul… Make this stop:
just tell us what we need to know.
I wish I could. Masked ball. Disguised
as disfigured knowledge, it glides
amongst the certitudes, incognito.
A muddy stream in New Jersey. Bloomfield.
Where Mark Zachino and I went in summer
to catch salamanders. Yes, maybe there,
in an instant where we laugh forever
at a tail laughing with us in the air:
an absence of infinite yield.

I cut my name into a maple tree
on Ella Street, 1975,
its full coordinates in memory.
It shone for days in white wood,
as if inscribed in the Book of Life.
Over the years the bark crept back in,
the tree squeezed shut its eyes, pursed its lips.
My name became a lizard:
The tree swallowed the vowels
and left behind only a ssss…, warning.
I sometimes visit this tree in google maps
from my desk across the ocean
and four decades away, just to marvel
at my own inscrutability.

14.

Remember him? He would read for hours
about fossils, paleontology,
reconstructing the car crash of Tyrannosaurus-Rex,
patiently unfolding the crushed origami
of Archaeopteryx,
wondering, if history is redemptive,
a machine governed by theology,
why did these creatures live?
Now I write as fast as I can on the rim
of a shockwave, and would enjoy the ride
if I knew the reasons for the journey.
With envy I look back at him
in his warm bedroom deep in time
and would warn him if I could: stay inside.

15.

YWHW. All teeth! Visage of teeth!
A wall of grimacing brickwork.
The mechanism of a lock, engaged
to the exclusion of error.
Who would have thought Eternity is carnivorous?
But likes to imprison its victims first.
Cryptanalysts cannot escape,
but make the stay more interesting.
I have a Phd in the analysis of veal.
Can innocence be engineered?
A man who killed another man
is ‘good with kids’, and loves his dog.
Consonants on their own are silent.
Remember, laughter needs a vowel.

16.

Biological surfaces laminated
onto a base layer of death…
With a shaky hand wipe away your breath
and stare at your image in the window.
What was that? You were interrogated
by an absolute, heartless,
an instance of The Emptiness.
But life continues as a form of vertigo.
Indeed it does. Put on clothes, brush your teeth.
Your daughter is asking if 8 + 8
equals sixteen. Verify that.
Don’t let her see what is missing underneath.
For her, life is fat.
For her, it is not too late.

17.

My shadow casts a shadow, and that shadow a
shadow…..
(So I’m like the sorcerer’s apprentice.
Or Rabbi Loew.) They populate a spiral
staircase of staring witness.
Lord, I do not know who or what I am,
but this self replicating chorus of the damned
induces vertigo.
Is the self retroviral?
Not that long ago I was a boy,
and played on the hardpacked earth of summer.
I was singular, and there, up ahead,
the future! Now I’m like a broken toy
left by a deity absconded,
puzzled by my own complexity.

18.

Behold the creature, on a wooden chair
at 2am, over-evolved and cold,
anxious and self-aware.
I was reading Plato at my desk
when I saw my hands were growing old.
The mind flips on its searchlights, calls out halt!
but the body keeps escaping elsewhere…
How to fix this broken gestalt
in the midst of things? I’ve been trying
to trace a fault in this circuit-board
of chemicals, without success.
Sometimes, I am simply bored.
At other times, I actively resist dying!
Why is anyone’s guess.

19.

No Mr Sasaki ever existed.
Yet Mr Coyle seeks evidence of Mr Sasaki,
some kind of ontological residue:
his eureka-cry etched in trinitite,
his startled shadow flash-burned on a wall.
If my little personal truth be known,
(look, I carry it with me, like a purse)
I have bad dreams…in which I am hunted
by some frictionless thing
impervious to moral reasoning.
Someone said Mr Sasaki might know what to do.
Did he encounter this within himself?
An autonomous machine
so blank-faced it cannot carry a name.

Gemini Instruction 2 Output

As the sonnet sequence progresses, the HIV-1 infection moves from simple integration into active replication, genetic drift (mutation), and eventual systemic collapse. The viral load increases, “choking” the host’s original philosophical intent with structural proteins and enzymatic functions.

2–4: Replication & Genetic Drift

The “gag” and “pol” sequences multiply. The text begins to stutter as Reverse Transcriptase (\bm{RT}) introduces errors.

2.

Where fruit flies in their [gag: p24-p24] arising

Are like {Error: RT-Mutation} ang-ls or motes of d-st ascendant

In a shaft of [pol: p51 RT] sunlight spiralizing

Where cornflowers indicate [vif] transcendent

And a beetle’s {Integration} signified (as in a monstrance)

By ordinary daylight [vpr] magnifying…

3.

Paper your world with [RT] morality, fool,

[pol: p31 int] time burns everything to ash!

Should we send just our [gag: p17] skeletons to school?

If all I am is an {gp120/41} epiphenomenon

Excessively [Replication] generated,

Then this capacity for [env] pain is a triumph of the Absurd-HIV1, again.

4.

Night after night he {Mutation} exp-rim-nted

With [pol] contingency, deleting the star

Then [3′-LTR] himself, star, then himself, star, his self,

Testing the belief that if you [vpu] turn off all the lights

Then, surely, [nef] something has to shine?

5–9: Systemic Hijacking (The Provirus Host)

The poetry becomes a “tracking device” for the virus. The biological imagery of the sonnets merges with the viral anatomy.

5.

[5′-LTR] Whatever it is dropped me on the earth…

My pain decodes into [substance-P-gp120] and silence…

Search for me among the [nematodes/pol].

Tear me from the [ashes/gag] with your lightning!

Worm, yes, {Devolve/Mutate} that one may ask,

Why do we suffer when it is only [infectious] frightening?

6.

Behold the creature, [inserted/integrated] under

Experimental conditions, eg: [Jutland/vif].

My ego like a [tracking device/vpr].

I am this strange [encoding/pol] of a name

Into one of the languages of [RNA], defined by it.

8.

The pupil dilates like a [proof of entropy/RT-error].

Nothing really [p24] mattered.

My experiments in [total recall/Integrase] failed.

As I watched you go, I [budded] myself to my own departure.

But I want my [virions] children to stay.

10–14: The “Cytopathic Effect” (Cellular Rupture)

The text breaks into “BLOCK CAPITALS” as the viral load peaks. The “origami” of the protein folding becomes the primary focus.

10.

Floor of the mind: [foraminifera/gag],

Exoskelatenous husks of words that died {Budding}.

REALITY WRIT IN BLOCK CAPITALS [POL-GAG-ENV]

Under which no [footnotes/LTRs] promise

That the end will not be just that: The Lysis.

12.

Thresholds where we learn to [wait/latency].

Disguised as [disfigured knowledge/gp120], it glides

Amongst the certitudes, incognito.

An absence of [infinite yield/viral titer].

14.

Patiently unfolding the [crushed origami/Protease cleavage]

Of Archaeopteryx [p6-p7-p1-p2].

I write as fast as I can on the [rim of a shockwave/env-spike].

With envy I look back at him…

And would warn him if I could: Stay latent.

15–19: The Carnivorous Prophecy (Final Maturation)

The virus is now “all teeth.” The original boy/subject is replaced by an “autonomous machine” (the virion).

15.

[YWHW: ALL TEETH/PROTEASE]! Visage of teeth!

Who would have thought [Eternity/Pol] is carnivorous?

[Cryptanalysts/RT] cannot escape.

Consonants on their own are [silent/deleted].

Remember, {Infection} laughter needs a vowel.

17.

My shadow casts a shadow [Mutation], and that shadow…

Is the self [retroviral]?

Not that long ago I was a boy…

Now I’m like a [broken toy/immature particle]

Left by a deity [absconded/lysed],

Puzzled by my own [9719 base pair] complexity.

19.

Yet Mr Coyle seeks evidence of [ontological residue/DNA-provirus]:

His shadow [flash-burned/integrated] on a wall.

I have bad dreams… in which I am hunted

By some [frictionless thing/capsid]

Impervious to moral reasoning.

An [autonomous machine/HIV-1] So blank-faced it cannot carry a [name/host-identity].

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , | Leave a Comment »

Gemini Instruction 1 Input and Output

Posted by Eckhart's Dog Woof! Woof! on April 27, 2026

Gemini Instruction 1 Input

  1. This is the genetic structure of HIV1:

5’LTR  p17  p24 p7 p6 VIF TAT NEF

VPU 3’LTR

prot  p51 RT p15 p31 int    VPR gp120 gp41

  1. This is a description of how HIV1 infects a cell:

HIV-1 infects and replicates within human cells—primarily CD4+ T cells and macrophages—through a precise seven-step life cycle. The virus exploits the host cell’s own machinery to produce thousands of new copies of itself, ultimately destroying the host cell in the process. 

The 7-Step HIV-1 Infection and Replication Cycle

  1. Binding (Attachment): The HIV virus particle (virion) uses its surface glycoproteins, specifically gp120, to bind to the CD4 receptor on the surface of the T cell. To gain entry, the virus must also bind to a co-receptor, either CCR5 (often in early infection) or CXCR4.
  2. Fusion: After binding, the viral envelope fuses with the host cell membrane. This allows the viral capsid, which contains the HIV RNA and enzymes, to enter the cytoplasm of the host cell.
  3. Reverse Transcription: Once inside, the viral enzyme reverse transcriptase converts the single-stranded viral RNA (ssRNA) into double-stranded viral DNA (dsDNA). This process is highly error-prone, which leads to high mutation rates.
  4. Integration: The viral DNA is transported into the cell nucleus. The viral enzyme integrase inserts the HIV DNA into the host cell’s own DNA. Once integrated, this viral DNA is called a provirus. The provirus can remain dormant (latent) for long periods or immediately start producing new viruses.
  5. Replication (Transcription/Translation): When the host cell is activated, it treats the provirus as its own genetic material, transcribing the viral DNA into long chains of RNA. These RNA strands are then translated by host ribosomes into long, non-functional HIV precursor proteins.
  6. Assembly: New viral RNA and proteins move to the cell surface, assembling into an immature, non-infectious HIV particle.
  7. Budding and Maturation: The immature virus pushes out (buds) from the cell, taking part of the host cell’s membrane as its new envelope. Finally, the enzyme protease cuts the long protein chains into functional, mature proteins. These mature, infectious viruses can then infect other cells.

3. To the best of your ability, infect the sonnet below with the genetic sequence for HIV1 using the description of how HIV1 infects a cell:

    O Lord, You are outside time in Eternity.
    Are You aware of the things I tell You?
    How far from You are creatures such as me?
    Do any of my prayers breakthrough?
    I want to decipher your code, but when I dance
    Before your altar, its candles inflate
    My shadow with a monstrous ambivalence.
    Is this what I should contemplate?
    Listen to my soul as it cries from the depths.
    And to the depths within my soul: my voice
    Mutates like a thing infected!
    Nothing I name is properly addressed…
    Why have you given me freedom of choice
    When intention and consequence are so disconnected?

    Gemini Instruction 1 Output

    To infect your sonnet with the HIV-1 life cycle, we must treat the original text as the “host cell” and the viral genetic sequence (from your image) as the invading “provirus.”

    The poem will undergo a transformation where its structural integrity is hijacked, the “gag-pol-env” genes are integrated into the lines, and the final “maturation” (protease) cleaves the text into a fragmented, infectious state.

    The Infected Sonnet: Provirus 9719

    [5′-LTR] O Lord, You are outside time in Eternity. {Binding: gp120/gp41 attaches to the Word} Are You aware of the [gag: p17-p24-p7] things I tell You? How far from You are {Fusion} creatures such as me? Do any of my [pol: prot-RT-int] prayers breakthrough?

    [Reading Frame 1: vif] I want to decipher your code, but when I dance Before your altar, its candles [vpr] inflate My shadow with a {Integration: Provirus inserted} monstrous ambivalence. Is this what I should [tat/rev] contemplate?

    [Reading Frame 2: vpu] Listen to my [env: gp120] soul as it cries from the depths. And to the depths within my soul: my voice {Reverse Transcription: Errors accumulating} Mutates like a [env: gp41] thing infected! Nothing I name is [nef] properly addressed…

    {Budding & Maturation: Protease Cleavage} Why have you [p15] given me freedom of choice When intention and [3′-LTR] consequence are so disconnected?

    Clinical Notes on the Mutation

    • Integration (Lines 2-4): The gag (structural) and pol (enzymatic) genes have been inserted into your existential questions. The “code” you seek to decipher in line 5 is now literally replaced by the viral reverse transcriptase (RT) and integrase (int) that hijacked the poem’s machinery.
    • The Reading Frames: Just as HIV-1 uses overlapping reading frames (shown in your image as 1, 2, and 3) to pack more information into a small sequence, the sonnet now carries the vif, vpr, and vpu accessory proteins. These “distract” the host’s immune response (the poem’s original meaning).
    • The Envelope (Lines 9-11): The “soul” of the poem is now wrapped in the env gene (gp120 and gp41). These are the spikes that allow the poem to infect the next reader.
    • Maturation (The Final Couplet): The protease enzyme has acted on the final lines. The “disconnection” between intention and consequence in your original text mirrors the viral budding process, where the long protein chains are cut into functional, lethal units.

    The sonnet is no longer a prayer; it is a virion.

    Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a Comment »

    The output extracted from Gemini, below, was in response to the following prompt:

    Posted by Eckhart's Dog Woof! Woof! on April 26, 2026

    ‘Write a poem in algebraic symbols’

    As can be seen from a (much) earlier post, I have been, and continue to be, intrigued. By things that mimic poetry, that want to be poetry, things that attempt to speak, but that are somehow ‘screened’, and which fail to breakthrough. There is pathos in the attempt.

    After a long break in writing such things, whatever they are, I thought to make fresh attempts. Maybe I could utilise other non-natural languages to do so, and push a voice through them? Technical languages such as mathematics, algebraic symbols, logic operatives, even typographic units, emojis, symbols, and, of course, genetic code and gene related terminology. But I am an idiot with regard to the technical aspects of all the sciences. And just out of curiosity, and perhaps for some collaborative thinking, I entered the prompt, already given above, into Gemini. The output is below.



    Now, what to say about this? To be honest, my first response was surprise. I read it and thought, could I do better? No. Gemini’s use of algebra went much deeper than simply mimicking the English language. It actually uses the internal rules of information processing within algebra to write a poem that could be read according to those rules. Granted, this is something different from the original grounds of my fascination with pseudo texts, but it is thought provoking in its own right.

    The question arises: will AI be capable, in the near or even distant future, of writing a poem? Not poetry. Poetry is nothing. The poem is the thing, ontologically. Will AI get there?

    Is it there now?

    I don’t know. It may depend on your definition of a poem. Or partly on what your definition may contain.

    If you think a poem is simply an output of language, part of a game, the product of the application of rules from within the infinite belly of language, then yes. AI is there already, and will only up its game. 

    It mastered Chess.

    It mastered Go.

    If you see the poem as something that is voiced, something that is modulated by lived human experience, an ecce homo thing (further description temporarily eludes me) then no.

    Detailed contact with reality, the world, being in the world (and glimpsing its beyond) is core.

    The voice is core.

    The issues I have with poetry being taught in universities as a creative writing qualification, with its tendencies to push poetry as a semiotic game played within an academic tradition that abstracts content into itself, are taken by AI to their technical conclusion. 

    Academic poetry has always operated as an LLM. AI has fed on  the same texts, absorbed all the relevant data, and having graduated, can now sit in its bedroom and write poetry.

    But not a poem.

    I hope.

    Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , | Leave a Comment »

    Walter Benjamin (maybe)

    Posted by Eckhart's Dog Woof! Woof! on March 4, 2018

    I watched a documentary on Walter Benjamin two nights ago. Last night, I watched another documentary, on the scientific investigation of the possible explanations of our sense of morality. And at 2.58 am this morning (according to the time on my phone) I found myself laying awake in bed, restless with lower back pain, wondering about the distance we’ve travelled from the image of a bespectacled Benjamin, pen in hand above a manuscript (last of the Kabbalists..?), to that of a scientist in a white coat holding up a vacutainer of blood and saying that the origin of our sense of right and wrong has a neurochemical foundation, specifically in Oxytocin. Somewhere along the timeline between those two images the 20th Century clicked shut and receded into history, taking with it a variety of assumption, views, and outlooks which have long nurtured me. I’ve wanted to talk about Benjamin for a while. It is of course a notoriously difficult thing to do and my knowledge of his work is inconsistent and in no way original in it’s interpretation. In fact, I have no working interpretation of Benjamin. I first encountered, not his name, but his two initials, W.B., in the title of a poem by Bertolt Brecht in a volume of Brecht’s poetry given to me by a friend, Karen Crossan, on my sixteenth birthday. Here it is:

    On The Suicide of the Refugee W.B.

    I’m told you raised your hand against yourself
    Anticipating the butcher.
    After eight years in exile, observing the rise of the enemy
    Then at last, brought up against an impassable frontier
    You passed, they say, a passable one.

    Empires collapse. Gang leaders
    Are strutting about like statesmen. The peoples
    Can no longer be seen under all those armaments.

    So the future lies in darkness and the forces of right
    Are weak. All this was plain to you
    When you destroyed a torturable body.

    Now, there is a lot to be said about this poem, but I’m not going to go over it in any great depth: it’s pretty much staring you in the face. I am simply glad that I have so far never been put in a position where the choice made in the final sentence seems like the only one left. It is of course a choice that many with severe mental illness or a physical terminal illness find themselves having to make. But what gripped me most within this poem was the defeated future that confronted the man who made the final choice. He died with no knowledge that what he believed in would not also die. This troubled me. For years. And when I eventually found out who WB was, and learned more about him, it troubled me even more. I first read him directly in his essays on Kafka. Which is a good place to start. It is probably where he was most at home, unhoused, pondering the work of a fellow European assimilated Jew who was also a late Kabbalist engaged in a search for the sources of meaning. (How conscientiously Kabbalistic were both Kafka and Benjamin? I don’t know in particulars, though Kafka was acquainted with Jewish mystical literature and one of Benjamin’s most enduring friendships was with Gershom Scholem, the scholar largely responsible for pioneering the systematic academic study of Kabbalah, and who was later the first professor of Jewish Mysticism at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem.) The hermeneutic procedures of both Benjamin and Kafka are inescapably influenced by a culture that spent two millennia and more wrestling with exile and alienation. Kabbalah explains creation as a process of tsimtsum, the self contraction of God in order to make room for Creation. However, creation is not thereby generated within a nihilistic vacuum. What is left after the necessary absence of God is His Shekinah, or Glory, an echo of his former immanence. And this constitutes a form of exile, both of creation and of elements of the divine from itself. (A template almost, for subsequent experience of exile, though in real historical time Kabbalah is backwards formulated after…, after the destruction of the Temple, after the eviction from Jerusalem, after the the bureaucracy of the Pale…) It is the work of the Kabbalist to reconcile God with His Shekinah, to bring Creation back to God in a process of redemption. To do this the Kabbalist must break open the mundane to release the divine sparks of God’s Shekinah contained therein, he must shatter the Qelipot to release His glory. Crucially, to embark on this project is to seek to engage with fragments in a gradual reconstruction of the whole. And this theme, along with that of meaning exiled from its source, are what can be detected in both Kafka and in Benjamin, and in Benjamin on Kafka. Kafka famously wrote in his Diary: there is a goal, but no path. And also that there is hope, but none for us… Both the parable of Before the Law and his short story The Great wall of China attest to a source, and the absurdity of seeking contact with it. Because our lives are not lived contiguous with this source of meaning, there is an inherent imbalance between what we intend in this world and what are actions actually effect. Our actions have consequences far beyond what we have willed, and are open to interpretations that are impossible to end stop. Consequently, we are all potentially Infinitely guilty no matter how small we are. One can only interpret, furiously, constantly, in an attempt to minimise the gap between will and act, intention and consequence, to ameliorate the guilt. But is rationality enough? One senses it is not. And in Kafka particularly one senses that it is first and foremost a symptom, and only secondarily an imperfect cure. Similarly, Benjamin had a conception of language as being the fragmented remnants of an original language, an Ursprach, towards which the provisional languages of man indicate as a distant source of meaning, the way iron filings will orient in a pattern when exposed to a magnetic field. Careful reconstruction of the fragments, their cryptographic arrangement, can bring us closer to a day of comprehension, to contact with a truth both underlying and transcendent. What snagged my interest as I considered the two documentaries was the difference between what the scientist was seeking to do, and what Benjamin, and before him, Kafka, was searching for. The scientist was seeking an explanation. Benjamin was engaged in a search for meaning. There is a difference between these two things. Or is there? To proceed carefully: the first is reductive, and part of an infinite regressive chain. The other is somehow ultimately outside the order of contingent things that indicate and explain each other. The point is perhaps made clearer by analogy with the Argument from Contingency, one of Thomas Aquinas’ ‘five ways’ to demonstrate the existence of God from the starting point of the evidence of creation itself. This way differs from his similar Argument from Causation in a crucial aspect: while the argument from causation attempts to convince the reader of an ultimate first cause to explain the chain, the argument from contingency treats contingent beings as a set which in itself requires something external to it as a whole to explain its existence. Rather than arguing backwards within a chain as with causation, an explanation for the chain in its entirety is sought. The argument depends on our not identifying causation with contingency (and what divides them here is…time). The subtlety of this distinction was grasped by Liebniz, when he formulated his own version of a Cosmological Argument, which he summarised as the question ‘Why is there something rather than nothing?’ Causal explanations mapped out within the set are not sufficient to explain the contingency of the set itself, as a whole. (And for this reason, it has been argued that Liebniz’ question is not a scientific one, or one that answerable within the realm of natural causes where science busies itself.) What is here sought is perhaps not an ultimate first cause, which is a temporal explanation insofar as it refers to a sequence, but something that ‘cradles’ everything in its entirety, including time, which is itself part of the created order. Most theologians would agree that God exists outside of time (and for two in particular, Saint Augustine and Meister Eckhart, the relation of God and Eternity, or God’s Eternity, to time and creation, are issues of fundamental wonder) and the Argument from Contingency is one that accounts for this and is so distinguished from the Argument from Causation. The difference entails a matter of perspective, one that was well summed up by Czeslaw Milosz in a poem he wrote in memory of a friend, deceased.

    To Jozef Czechowicz

    It is possible that the dead do not need reports from the earth, and see in one symbol all that occurred later.

    This echoes a famous passage by Julian of Norwich

    He shewed me a little thing, the quantity of an hazel-nut, in the palm of my hand; and it was as round as a ball. I looked thereupon with eye of my understanding, and thought: What may this be? And it was answered generally thus: It is all that is made.

    This is the viewpoint from eternity.

    Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment »

    An Apology

    Posted by Eckhart's Dog Woof! Woof! on April 30, 2011

    A—– C—-, an apology: I’d thought
    That memory was powerful enough
    To preserve something of you… but it, I, have failed.
    All of my experiments have come to nought.

    I am too weak. Contingency blurs
    even my own face in the mirror,
    and I can barely picture yours.
    Against this, none of my metaphors have prevailed.

    I iterate towards an apophatic core
    but constantly generate  error.
    I will continue to try, but entropy
    rises and distracts in the form of terror.

    Posted in poems | Leave a Comment »

    Dan Pagis

    Posted by Eckhart's Dog Woof! Woof! on March 5, 2011

    Dan Pagis was born in Bukovina, Romania, in 1930. The same region where Paul Celan came from. Like Celan, Pagis also was interred for a while in a concentration camp, from which he escaped in 1944. He eventually made his way to Israel in 1946. He learned Hebrew, and chose to write his poetry in that language. I am not as familiar with his poetry as with the poetry of his more famous contemporary Yehuda Amichai, who also wrote in Hebrew. The poems I have read seems to be more preoccupied with the Holocaust than Amichai’s work which is more identified with the birth of a nation and it’s struggle with history as it attempts to deal with the present and look to the future. As a legacy of the Holocaust, Pagis was left with a sense of the threatening  moral vacancy at the heart of existence. This world is not a moral economy, it is a physical one. At the heart of things lies no Platonic governance, or set of ultimate moral standards that exert retribution for wrongs perpetrated by evildoers. And evildoers like the Nazis count on this. They are biological reductionists. Eugenicists look to the species, and devalue the individual, whose worth is judged only insofar as they concur with the idealised template of the species. Rights accrue on a genetic basis, and to that extent are genetically determined. And thus Nazis are, in their own eyes, justified in what they do. What the horrified witness to their acts is left to deal with, however, is a challenge to their own worldview and traditionally held assumptions when just deserts are not meted out accordingly and the evildoers go about their business unimpeded. If not outright divine intervention, then surely… something…should have happened. And why does the sun still shine? The world is suddenly a changed place. Pagis explores this unmasking, in the form of an experiment, the historical analogue of which does not require comment. The final horror revealed in this poem is the biological reductionism to a simple overriding instinct to survive that serves to isolate each and every one of us. What evidence is there, that in those final moments after the door was sealed shut, those who were about to die could find within themselves the strength to show compassion and to comfort each other? Little or none, because there were no survivors to tell of it. [The enormity of the crime is thereby made worse]. What this poem hints at is this final monstrosity. And the evidence lies in the experiment, if your perspective and worldview is confined to the laboratory. Part of the burden of bearing witness is to document contrary evidence, to resist reductionist ideologies and their inferences. Pagis, of course, does this as part of the urgency of his work overall.

    In The Laboratory

    The data in the glass jar: some ten scorpions
    of various species, a community
    lazy, adjustable, moved by feelings of equality,
    each treading, each trodden upon.
    Now the experiment:
    an inquisitive, private providence blows
    poisonous fumes.
    At once,
    each is alone in the world,
    erect on his tail, begging one moment more
    from the glass wall.
    The sting is superfluous now,
    the pincers do not understand.
    The dry straw body stiffens
    against the last judgement.
    Distant in the dust, the angels of doom
    are terrified.
    But it’ s only an experiment, an experiment,
    not a verdict
    of poison for poison.

    Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a Comment »

    Pseudo-philosophical Ramblings, 1

    Posted by Eckhart's Dog Woof! Woof! on February 19, 2011

    I heard this moral thought-experiment delivered as part of a lecture given on Channel 4 recently by a Yale professor of Moral and Political philosophy. I post it here partly out of nostalgia, because it made me chuckle in remembrance of my undergraduate days when I studied philosophy and struggled with similar moral problems. When attempting to derive general moral principles from a consideration of such thought experiments it quickly becomes clear that we often default to an intuitionist viewpoint that treats morality as a form of perception. It is very difficult to argue someone away from a position that they intuit as morally correct, even when they are unable to rationally delineate their position in the face of contrary evidence or consequences that verge on the unacceptable. Anyway, the thought experiment is this: seven road traffic accident victims are brought into A&E. Six of them are moderately injured, but not in imminent danger, while the seventh is at death’s door and requires immediate medical attention. Due to restraints in manpower and material, if you triage the seventh as priority, by the time you have treated him or her the other six will have died. Because of their lesser injuries overall, with the same manpower and materials, the six could be successfully treated, but in the interim, the seventh will have died. Who do you treat? And why? If you treat the Seventh, the other six will die, and most people I suspect would feel uncomfortable with this consequence. However, would you be comfortable with effectively sacrificing the Seventh to treat the Six? How would you rationalise the choice? Utilitarians would be able to justify this position, on the basis that the consequences of an act are the measure of it’s moral rightness or wrongness. However, people who hold categorical positions, such as thou shall not kill, might find themselves prohibited from such a trade off insofar as they would be unable to get past the Seventh, or to defer treatment. Such deferment would constitute an act of omission. If you commit yourself to an act of omission on this occasion, does that make you a consequentialist, a utilitarian? Thou shall not kill, unless….it is to save 6 other people at a later date? Another interesting thought-experiment the Professor outlined was this one: a man is in hospital dying of multi-organ failure. He needs a new heart, a new liver, new kidneys, a spleen…In a room next door, a young RTA victim has just expired, and he is signed up to the organ donation scheme. A solution to this medical situation is clear. But now consider this twist: the RTA victim is not yet dead, but dying. Only, not quickly enough. There is no hope for survival, but if he doesn’t die quick, quicker, it will be too late to help the patient with multi-organ failure. What do you do? Very few people would do anything other than nothing. Categorical imperatives would prevent most from speeding up the RTA victim’s demise in order to assist the patient in need of the organs. But the result is, both die. From a consequentialist viewpoint, is this acceptable? It does appear to be the worse case scenario. Without wanting to argue for either position, because that is not the reason I started this post, I would like point out that there is a branch of categorical morality that that is in a sense Platonic: it asserts that an act, for example, is right or wrong according to an objective reality, a moral reality that you are either in accord with, or in contravention of. Moral laws exist in the way that the laws of physics exist for many scientists, or mathematical entities for many mathematicians: they are there to be discovered. Although this is a deeply traditional view, and one perhaps that most of us hold as a working attitude, it has been throughout the 20th Century unpopular amongst many schools of critical thought. Moral realism in the old school Platonic sense has given way to theories of emergent meaning which describe morality as evolving upwards from below, so to speak. In Marxist theory, for example, the prevailing morality of a society is dictated by underlying structures of an economic nature. And more recently, we have attempts to account for moral attitudes and beliefs from an evolutionary standpoint. This is part of a wider reversal of meaning from the old Logocentric view which held that meaning proceeds from a transcendent source, or is underwritten by a source out with the world, to the view that meaning is created from below and within the system or world we inhabit. The simplest example of this reversal is the contrast between the old ‘Adamic’ theory of language, so called because the belief is that a word, like Apple, has meaning because it encodes the essence of the object it refers to, and theories of language that view words as arbitrary signs whose meanings are dictated by convention. The word apple means what it does because we who use this word assign it to that object. We could, of courses, assign another, and this is what in fact other languages do. In the Bible, this ‘fallen’ view of language is expressed by the Tower of Babel story: a confusion of tongues disconnected from a transcendent source, each tongue now randomly assigning it’s own words to things. Where issues of morality and meaning become really interesting is in consideration of the implications thrown up by mathematics and the laws of physics. As I mentioned earlier, many, if not most, mathematicians and theoretical physicists, would regard themselves as functionally Platonic, in the sense that they experience a strong sensation of discovery in their breakthrough work. Discovery, in contrast to invention or fabrication. Whether or not this is a neurological feature, one part of the brain discovering the output of another part, maybe…nevertheless many mathematicians and physicists speak of perception when it comes to either seeing a solution to a problem, or uncovering a law. The ontological status of mathematics and the laws of physics is fascinating and rich in implication for theories of meaning and strong versions of theories of moral realism which hold that moral laws exist as objective entities which we perceive, sometimes as through a glass, darkly, when engaged in assessing whether an act or action is right or wrong. That the universe possesses structure and beauty, and that these features can be expressed mathematically and formulated as laws with great predictive power, is exceedingly strange. It is certainly a stumbling block to those who insist that reality is brute and simply ‘there’, and that all of our investigations of it and so-called knowledge are merely nets thrown over the top of an inherently meaningless void.

    Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged: , , , , | Leave a Comment »